Most businesses treat a GST audit as over once the officer stops asking questions. In reality, the period between the first set of observations and the final report is when the outcome is actually decided — and it is the stage most often wasted.
Handled properly, a large share of audit objections close without any demand at all. Handled poorly, the same objections harden into a show cause notice, an order, and an appeal that takes years.
This is where good GST audit services from Loklzo fnalvzacxr prove their worth: not in producing documents, but in knowing which objections to concede, which to contest, and when. This guide sets out how to work through them methodically.
This is the point that changes everything, and most taxpayers do not know it.
During a Section 65 audit, the officer must inform you of any discrepancies identified as audit observations, and you are entitled to respond. The findings are finalised only after your reply has been considered. The formal report in Form ADT-02 — issued within thirty days of the audit concluding — comes afterwards.
So there are two distinct opportunities, not one. Objections answered convincingly at the observation stage often never appear in ADT-02. Objections ignored at that stage arrive in the report as settled conclusions, and everything after that is uphill.
| Stage | What it is | Your move |
| Audit observations | Draft objections raised during the audit | Reply with evidence — the best opportunity you get |
| ADT-02 | Final audit findings, within 30 days of conclusion | Address anything still open; correct voluntarily if warranted |
| DRC-01A | Pre-notice intimation of tax ascertained | Explain in Part B or pay through DRC-03 |
| DRC-01 | Show cause notice | Reply in DRC-06 with full documentation; request a hearing |
| Order | Demand confirmed | Appeal within three months, plus one condonable |
Notice how the cost of dealing with the same issue rises at every stage.
Across our GST audit services in India engagements, the same items recur:
Do not begin writing until each objection has been placed in one of three buckets.
Accept. The objection is correct. Quantify it precisely, pay through DRC-03 with interest, and record it in the reply. Voluntary correction before a notice generally attracts no penalty in non-fraud cases.
Partly accept. The objection is right in principle but wrong in amount — usually because the officer worked from a summary figure. Pay the correct portion, and contest the balance with a reconciliation showing the derivation.
Contest. The objection is wrong on facts or on law. This needs evidence and, where relevant, reasoned legal grounds.
Mixing these together in one narrative reply is the most common drafting error. It leaves the officer unable to see what is conceded and what is disputed, and invites the whole objection to be confirmed. Getting this triage right, objection by objection, is the part of GST audit services India firms are really paying for.
Answer objection by objection, using the officer’s own numbering. For each one, state the objection, your position, the reasoning, and the annexures relied on. Index every annexure and reference it in the text.
Explanations should be arithmetical wherever possible. “The difference of ₹4.2 lakh represents credit notes issued in April, reconciled at Annexure 6” carries weight. “The figures are correct as per our records” does not.
Where you have a legal position, state it plainly — limitation, the scope of the period audited, a valuation principle, or an eligibility argument — because a ground not taken now is far harder to raise on appeal.
Officers sometimes press for immediate payment. Two things are worth knowing.
There is no spot recovery unless you accept the objection. If you do not agree, the department must proceed through a show cause notice and adjudication.
Equally, where an objection is genuinely correct, voluntary payment through DRC-03 before a notice is issued is usually the cheapest outcome available — it closes the issue and limits penalty exposure. The decision should follow your own reconciliation, not pressure in the room.
If matters proceed, the notice must be answered on the merits, and a demand confirmed in an order can be appealed within three months of communication, with one further month condonable, on a pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed tax.
One narrower point worth checking: where both Central and State authorities are pursuing you, the bar on parallel proceedings applies only to the same subject matter — the same period, the same issue, the same contravention. It is not triggered merely because both authorities are looking at the same taxpayer.
Our GST audit services for India clients cover the full arc, from pre-audit preparation to appeal:
Call +91-9667793597, emailinfo@gstcomplianceexperts.in or message us on WhatsApp with a copy of your observations, and we will tell you where you stand.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Can I respond to audit observations before ADT-02 is issued?
Yes, and you should. Findings are finalised only after your reply is considered, so this is the most valuable stage.
2. Is ADT-02 a demand?
No. It communicates findings. A demand requires a separate notice and adjudication.
3. Can the department recover tax on the spot during an audit?
Not unless you accept the objection. Otherwise, the matter proceeds through a show-cause notice.
4. Does paying through DRC-03 mean admitting liability on everything?
No, provided your reply states clearly that payment relates to specified objections and the balance is contested.
5. How long does the department have to complete an audit?
Three months from commencement, extendable by the Commissioner by up to six further months.
6. What if the audit covers a time-barred period?
Limitation applies to demands raised, and should be examined and raised as a ground at the earliest stage.
Read next: For notices that follow an audit — DRC-01A and DRC-01 — see our guide to GST notice handling services in Delhi.

